Stand up and fight!

October 6, 2011

Written by Oz Gunner


Theodore Roosevelt once said:

“It is not the critic who counts; not the man who points out how the strong man stumbles, or where the doer of deeds could have done them better. The credit belongs to the man who is actually in the arena, whose face is marred by dust and sweat and blood; who strives valiantly; who errs, who comes short again and again, because there is no effort without error and shortcoming; but who does actually strive to do the deeds; who knows great enthusiasms, the great devotions; who spends himself in a worthy cause; who at the best knows in the end the triumph of high achievement, and who at the worst, if he fails, at least fails while daring greatly, so that his place shall never be with those cold and timid souls who neither know victory nor defeat.”

It is undoubtedly my favourite quote of all time as it epitomizes what every athlete should deliver. Looking across the arsenal squad, there aren’t too many who could look themselves in the mirror and say they give their all to the team, to the fans, and for that great badge they wear. Robin Van Persie tries valiantly; Jack Wilshere leaves the whole kit and caboodle out on the pitch, as does Thomas Vermaelen. Who else? Maybe Szczesny, Song, and the young ones Coquelin and Frimpong. For a great team that houses a large squad this isn’t good enough, and when we are struggling or the pressure is on, the results are showing (The Carling Cup loss, both matches against the scum last year, manure game, Blackburn, and so forth).

Arsene has shown faith to a lot of players over the years, and it’s about time the team stood up as one and stop letting him take the heat. ‘Mr Arsenal’ Adams, Keown, Winterburn, Parlour, Rocky, Bould, Pires, Bergkamp, and players of the same mould throughout Arsenal’s great history wouldn’t stand for it. The passionless/lethargic jogger Denilson has left (hopefully to never return), Na$ri the traitor has sold his soul to the club that typifies everything that is wrong with football at the moment MAN CITY, and Cesc who many regard as an Arsenal legend has gone home (I cannot agree with it myself, legend is a word used too loosely in this day and age and grouping him with others legends of the club does them a disservice. Yes he longed to go home, but the way he left along with certain misdemeanours such as the barca backheel, the Tottenham handball (17 years of victory against our enemies down the drain), not showing up to the last game of the season, and going into hiding when the media circus went on has left a bitter taste in my mouth). The defectors have gone and with it hopefully comes a more united Arsenal.

‘Prince Robin’ should not have been alone when challenged by several Blackburn players, our great captain needed support, yet no one came.  When we are lacking inspiration someone should stand up and inspire the team with a bone-crunching (yet fair) tackle, a long chase from behind, or a great solo run. The fans also have a big role to play in this, some have given up and have chosen to ridicule Arsene and the team, and seem to want us to lose so they can spout ‘I told you so.’ I don’t know what they hope to achieve from this because Arsene is the best man for the job (yes he’s not without his faults, but name someone who could do better). While others staunchly stick by the team with unwavering loyalty, and this is what the team needs more of, without it the small amount of confidence that the team has left will disintegrate.

The team is being built from scratch, and hopefully along with it a siege mentality will be imparted. Arsenal will be back, we will win titles again, but it’s the players and fans that need to stand up and fight! Courage, loyalty and passion needed to be shown.

I give up my castle and lands. Here is my domain. Within this metal skin. And I pledge all that I still own; Muscle, bone, blood and the heart that pumps it to the mighty ARSENAL!


Give Chamakh more starts, and Arsenal might be all right again.

October 5, 2011


 

 

A passionate defence of an underrated Gunner, who deserves more respect!

Marouane Chamakh is an enigma to me. My gut feeling tells me he is a very important player for us, and yet his performances to date have been regarded as unimpressive.

Unimpressive if you compare him to Robin van Persie, and look at the hard stats of ‘total goals scored’ and ‘goals scored per game’; unimpressive if you study his body language – he seems uninterested, and unhappy with himself, and isolated and lost amongst his teammates. But statistics and perceptions are not all and everything, and I have learned to trust my gut feeling a bit more over the years.

Recently, the super-gelled Moroccan has come under some fierce criticism from fellow Gooners, and I feel a need to stand up for him. I believe Chamakh is a vital player for Arsenal and – here comes the controversial part – not as a sub, or a so called bench warmer, a squad player, no: Marouane’s real importance for Arsenal is to lead our attack from the start far more regularly.

I can imagine you saying now: you are a mad man: have you seen him recently? He just scored one goal and missed many opportunities – he is rubbish, get rid of him. Chamakh started three games for Arsenal this season: Udinese, Shrewsbury and Olympiakos, all three home games, and all three we won. RvP started 9 games in the same period of which we only won 3, drew 2 and lost 4. I can imagine you saying now: RvP has been (one of) our best player(s) and our bad start to the season has nothing to do with him: our problems lay somewhere else. I would ago along with that for now: it is early days and we have had to endure a topsy-turvy start to this season, so it would be wrong to pull any conclusions yet. Still, it is not unremarkable that we won 3 out of 3 when Marouane started for us in recent games.

I am not that keen on statistics. In fact, I can hardly listen to SKY Sports live commentary anymore, for the simple fact that statistics are thrown at us constantly, and very often these are totally useless and distract us from watching the game in peace. They like to use stats to have an indirect dig at Arsenal, cleverly leaving it to us to pull their (readily projected) conclusions. However, I realise I cannot say on this blog that Marouane Chamakh should get more starts, simply based on my gut feeling. So, I did some statistical homework regarding the previous season, and this is what I found:

Marouane Chamakh:

Started:  27 games (all competitions/ Arsenal only).

Team Goals during MC games started:   65 goals – on average 2.41 team goals per game.

Individual goals during MC games started: 11 goals – on average 0.41 individual goals per game.

Games won during MC games started: 16 wins – of all games started with MC 59% were won.

Games drew during MC games started: 6 draws.

Games lost during MC games started: 5 defeats.

Robin van Persie:

Started:  26 games (all competitions/ Arsenal only).

Team Goals during RvP games started: 48 goals – on average 1.85 team goals per game.

Individual goals during RvP games started: 18 goals – on average 0.69 individual goals per game.

Games won during RvP games started: 13 wins – of all games started with RvP 50% were won.

Games drew during RvP games started: 6 draws.

Games lost during RvP games started: 7 defeats.

So my gut feeling was right all along: Chamakh is an important player for us and compares well with Robin van Persie.

In fact, when Chamakh started for Arsenal during the 2010-2011 season, we scored significantly more goals (2.41 goals per game compared to 1.85 for RvP) and we won more games (59% compared to 50%) than when RvP started during that same period. Yet, the latter one is loved and respected and the former is, shall we say, less appreciated. You might say that MC is a striker and he should be judged on his goal scoring record, but for me that does not matter anywhere near as much as his contributions to us winning games. And btw, 0.41 goals per game is not bad at all. RvP’s 0.69 goals per started game is of course phenomenal, but if Arsenal – as a team – score less goals and win less games then this is, overall, less valuable to us.

For me, there are two reasons why Chamakh is less appreciated. Firstly, he is far less effective as a substitute. Marouane is simply not a super-sub and will probably never be one, but this is having a big impact on how he is perceived. Secondly, his contributions to our team are far less visible then those of RvP. He works hard and often with his back towards the goal, linking well with his fellow attacking midfielders, creating space and opportunities for them. This will not get him into the big headlines, as strikers are almost entirely judges on goals and assists – the curse of statistics.

When RvP plays, other attacking players appear to work hard to get him in goal-scoring positions – in a way ‘outsourcing’ the responsibility of scoring goals to him only. When Chamakh plays in games from the start, there appears to be more collective responsibility for scoring goals and he works hard to allow the midfield to move forward into the danger area, and to put his fellow attackers in positions to score goals. Of course, like every other Gooner, I would like him to be more selfish and hungry at times, but as the stats above indicate, his role and contributions to our team are more valuable to us than we think.

To give you an illustration of this: the other day, against Olympiakos, Chamakh was heavily criticised for his performance. He did not score, wasted a couple of good opportunities, and he did also not have any direct assists. Yet, both goals would not have happened if it was not for him. For the first one, he took defenders with him into the box, whilst the Ox was left with space to take, relatively unhindered, a shot from the best possible position (he took it well, mind you!). For the second one, he created the space for Santos to take a shot to the near post of the goalkeeper, who had no choice but to get a bit closer to Chamakh, so Santos could not play him in. You might say, I am clutching at straws, but football is a team sport and it’s often those sort of relatively small things that can make a real difference to whether goals are scored or not, or whether we win or lose.

Chamakh deserves more respect from us and, I for one, hope that he will get to start a lot more games for Arsenal this season.

Chamakh oh Chamakh
Not scoring, yet winning still
unveil your merit!

TotalArsenal.


The Kingdom of Arsenal.

October 4, 2011

Written by MickyDidIt89

Shrouded in a cloak of despondency as I was yesterday, to say nothing of a virus that will almost certainly condemn me to time in intensive care, I retired to bed last night with several bottles of stimulants lapping within, only to awake this morning with the thought that the only way forward was to adopt a siege mentality. Up with the drawbridge and down with the portcullis kind of stuff. All this castle speak brings me on to my brilliant idea. Now while I am very well known to myself for my brilliant ideas, I genuinely feel I have unearthed a solution and an opportunity that the more vapid observer will have failed to spot.

We, The Arsenal, ought to break away and form an Independent State. Stay with me for a moment, this is not so silly. Think Monaco or even The Vatican for that matter. I mean how hard could it possibly be? Ok, so we are going to have to seize some territory from the good people of Islington, but we already own large chunks of what we need. I would like to see Highbury returned to its rightful owners and become The Barracks. These would naturally house The Red and White Army.

Of course life would be Tax Free for anyone working within our borders, and as such, we will become stinking rich overnight without the need for sugar daddies. So it would be goodbye to Stan and Usmanov and hello to a new leader. Now for the sensitive bit.  A Republic or a Monarchy. On this issue I welcome suggestions, although as someone who likes his history and continuity (which is why I have always been a fan of the Hillwoodies), I propose the latter. Either way, we have the chance to spawn a new dynasty.

I understand there would be one or two things to sort out. Season Tickets are replaced by passports. That is simple enough. Our King (or Queen) would have limited powers under the new constitution. Naturally, due to our enormous new found wealth, alcohol would be free and available before, during and after all games. Of course we would find ourselves liberated from the beaurocratic shackles of Islington Health and Safety to say nothing of  Brussels or UEFA. Just think of the opportunities. Independent TV Rights. This list is endless and all good.

Frankly, I fail to see flaws, obstacles or any downside whatsoever.

King Tone works for me.

Now where are those pills?


Monday Morning Reds – Lost in Transition

October 3, 2011

Another Monday morning and off to work for many faced with the negative banter that an Arsenal defeat brings. But worse, not just any defeat the Spuds have turned us over, years of disingenuous crowing at our North London neighbours is coming home to roost today. All that “I can’t wait to get to work” of previous years, doesn’t work so well today does it?

To make it worse we Gooners have that sick feeling that all is not fair in our footballworld, another improbable killer goal hit from outside the area  just like the efforts in recent years by Bentley and Rose. How many first team appearances have those two made since, did they ever score again?

Having pulled back from another refereeing disaster, when he missed in the build up to the first goal a blatant hand ball that my cat would have spotted and she has been dead 5 years, bless her. You would have thought that was enough, but no, not this day not after all the pain we have inflicted on the spuds at their manor in years gone by. What self-respecting Gooner doesn’t know that we have won the league more times at the lane than the Lilywhites themselves? So take your victory you spuds, enjoy it doubly, knowing but not admitting that it was a mickey mouse win. Give us back our stick, whilst smirking at the thought that we have lost our most experienced and effective defender with a broken leg.

So is it the end of the world?  Nah, never, we face a tough season yes, injuries as ever drag us down, I wonder how long before some joker on a blog blames the medical team for Sagna’s injury. We have been here before, tough seasons are nothing new. What is new is the blog world and its outpourings of guilt, bile and criticism.  Well let’s have it today and then recognise yesterday for what it was, a brave if less than perfect performance by a team in turmoil from injury and change.

They say that “those who the gods wish to destroy they first make mad”, well it’s up to you fans, if you want to destroy our great club keep on being mad at players and staff. On the other hand if you wish to carry us through and back to greater heights, do what us older fans have done with generations of past Arsenal teams support them through their suffering, accept  it isn’t our year, but it is our team and look forward to the circle turning, Lady luck smiling on us and better days ahead.


Match report

A defeat at the hands of those shag-eared canker-blossoms from down the road always hurts.

It’s even worse when the defeat is LITERALLY at their hands (or, rather, their arm in this case).

And there was an outpouring of understandable negativity in the Arsenal Arsenal comments last night.

The aim of this match report is to offer a bit of perspective and to look for the positives out of what was, in the end, a disappointing day.

Overall it was a fairly even game between two decent teams. I would say we shaded it and deserved at least a point, probably all three.

The Spuds started brightly and gave us a few scares, but after the first 10 minutes we took complete control of midfield and looked the better side.

Gervinho had a great chance to put us ahead but shanked a low shot just past the post – what’s happened to his pre-season form, when he was banging them in for fun?

People will slag him off, but he was always willing to take on the defenders and regularly got past them, even if his ensuing use of the ball was less than perfect. Maybe he needs to polish that great domed forehead a bit more to blind the opposition.

Song, after a dodgy few minutes, settled in to his defensive duties really well, but his passing was off-key, frustratingly leading to us losing hard-earned possession without making the scumbags work for it.

Ramsey was busy, but his passing was also well off and several times in the final third he took the wrong option, killing promising attacking moves. I wrote a piece supporting Aaron last week, but he did not cover himself in glory in the NLD.

Just before Van-der-Cheat scored the opener we were looking very comfortable and I was beginning to relax. Silly me.

A quick counter-attack, a pass out to the left of the box from the otherwise ineffectual Adebarndoor and Van-der-Cheat clearly brought the ball down with his left arm before passing it into the net.

Such is our luck with decisions these days that neither the lino nor the ref spotted it, although I felt our closest defenders (mainly the BFG) could have done more in making vociferous appeals for handball.

Half time 0-1.

The start of the second half was delayed because of a problem with one of the goal nets. Apparently Harry got a job lot from a bloke down the market.

For the first few minutes of the second half we again looked shaky, but then Song made a powerful run from the back, got to the by-line like a winger and put in a good cross. Aaron Ramsey was on hand to skillfully divert the ball into the roof of the net.

When it came to passing, Ramsey’s radar appeared to have been borrowed from the Exxon Valdez, but he showed his ability to be in the box at the right time (a rare skill among Arsenal players in recent years) and will continue to score goals for us.

Following the goal we completely dominated the game for about 20 minutes and could have had a couple more, but our attacks were frustratingly breaking down at the vital moment.

Then Sagna landed badly after a challenge by the touchline and went off on a stretcher with what is being reported is a broken leg. Jenkinson came on but our rhythm was disturbed and when Twitchy took the Cheat off and replaced him with the more combative Sandro, the game fell back into the balance again.

The second Spud goal game from a wicked long shot by Walker – another Danny Rose moment. If I was Walker I’d be worried that I was about to disappear without trace, just like Rose. The ball swerved viciously just before reaching Szczesney, who I thought did well to get a hand to it.

But in the run-up our defence looked far more stretched than it should have been at 1-1 in a NLD away from home: the familiar feeling of us chasing the win when we might have been better off shutting up shop for the point.

After that we huffed and puffed but never really looked like scoring and, far too often, we gave the ball away when not under direct pressure – a result of either nerves or tiredness.

Some perennial issues about the defence were raised: why were we playing such a high line? I don’t know the answer to that, but it seemed to work in terms of reducing the amount of Spud attempts on goal. The defenders were talking to each other and the offside trap worked well on several occasions.

This was a much easier defeat to take than some of the recent capitulations (against the Spuds and others). We played some good football, we looked the better team for most of the game and everyone seemed to give their all. I just don’t get the comments made last night about our players not trying.

We are a team in transition, following the extremely late moves we made in the transfer window and the succession of injuries and suspensions that have blighted us ever since. Apparently we have used more players in our EPL games this year than any other team (27, to be exact).

Players are still learning to work together and the hardest part to get right in this respect is in the final third. But we showed enough to make me believe it will come good sooner rather than later.

I thought there were many encouraging signs and some very promising performances, notably from Szczesney, Gibbs, Song, Mertesacker and Coquelin.

If the referee or linesman had spotted the Cheat’s handball, if Szczesney had managed a slightly firmer touch on Walker’s shot, if Gervinho had buried his (relatively) easy chance we might well be celebrating a win.

All the pundits have no hesitation in counting the Spuds and Liverpool as serious contenders for fourth place. We have played both and have been better than both, despite the fact that we don’t have a single point to show for either game.

It’s fashionable to slate Arsenal right now, but we’re in better shape than our league position indicates.

Player Ratings

Szczesney:  Made some top class saves and the second goal was a harder save than it looked. 7

Sagna:  Did well to keep Bale quiet and was his usual dependable self until the unfortunate injury. 6

Mertesacker: Played well overall, even though the high line probably doesn’t suit him. Got a bit lost for the first goal. 6

Song: Had Adebarndoor in his pocket for most of the match. His passing was occasionally erratic. 6.5

Gibbs: Worked well up and down the line all day long. His best game for us this season, although a couple of times he found himself the wrong side of his man. 7

Ramsey: Hard working but his passing touch was off all game. An extra point for the goal though. 5.5

Arteta: Good game without overly imposing himself. He always has time, seldom loses the ball and was the oil in our midfield engine. 6

Coquelin: What a prospect this boy is. Tackling, passing and positional play were all very good. He faded, but is definitely ahead of Frimpong in his development. MoTM, 7.5

Walcott: Did what he could, including trying a few long shots, but things didn’t quite come off. 6

Gervinho: I like his willingness to take on defenders but his end product needs to improve. Should have opened the scoring for us. 6

Van Persie: Showed his class whenever he had the ball, but the understanding with our front three is not quite there yet. 7

Subs
Jenkinson: I thought he did well when he came on, although he was not able to contain Bale as well as Sagna had. 6

Benayoun: Hustled and bustled, but couldn’t make anything happen. 6

Arshavin: Didn’t have much time to change things. But he’s the sort of player you’d hope would pull out a moment of magic. Sadly, he’s all muggle and no wizard at the moment.

Written by dandan and match report by RockyLives


The Road to Hell.

October 2, 2011

In my youth Highbury was a less than salubrious place (sorry to those who grew up there!). Coming from a leafier part of North London the journey on the 210 bus seemed like entering a foreign land. How things have changed. Today the squares of Highbury and Islington are seriously des. res.. Sadly but unsurprisingly  the reverse has happened to Tottenham which has been directly reflected in the success of our football teams.

Despite last season’s loss at home, the first since the Blitz, we have a fantastic record against the blue-bellies. Recent history has seen Arsenal gift big leads and collapse under pressure – the 4-4 still hurts. We have already seen some the same from our team this season and as such the fans are fearful.

Can we beat the beetle-headed miscreants that slither out of the tunnel at  N17?

For the first time in many  seasons we go into the game as underdogs. Hard to believe but true. Redknapp has assembled a fine squad of players (OK Kelsey) who are in very good form.  There is hardly an area of the pitch that Spurs are weak – perhaps they lack a decent left back plus their GK is old enough to be Szczesny’s father. The loan signing of the comedy villain was a superb piece of business by Harry which, at least temporarily, will solve his goal scoring problems. If one were to take a straw poll of Arsenal supporters prior to the game asking the question “Do you expect Adebayor to score?”, there would be a 90% Yes vote which indicates the fear factor.

Thankfully we have a few players returning from injury – Gervinho, Benayoun and Walcott, but crucially not Koscielny. The BFG + Song CB combo worked well but we needed Song in midfield, sadly that seems unlikely as Miguel  and Squillaci are injured. We are now likely to see a midfield of Ramsey Frimpong, Arteta and Benayoun. Spurs midfield is strong and enhanced by the signing of Parker – were his wages the stumbling block to our signing him?

Santos or Gibbs? Gibbs was rested on Weds which indicates that will start. Not my choice but I have no access to the training ground. I like the promise of Santos – he looks hard.

Arshavin or Benayoun or Gervinho? Arshavin played midweek but following his less than explosive display he must be raring to go today. Does Mr. Wenger gamble with the more attacking Gervinho? Your guess is as good as mine. Does he play a traditional 4-3-3 or  a more secure defensive 4-4-2?

The defence. We all know the problems. The introduction of zonal marking, the loss of TV, the lack of communication, the loss of form and confidence. I believe we are learning and are on the way to having a better defence based around a superb keeper. There is no question today will be a hard test; in Bale, VDV, Ade, Defoe/Lennon and Modric Spurs have formidable weapons, but our boys have to show they can defend against the best otherwise we must accept we need further strengthening.

My team:

Yes I know – it is not really a 4-3-3 but I believe we should pack our midfield  reducing the potency of their pace and rely upon Theo to take advantage of the space created further forward. Plus it would be good to start Benayoun at what should be his home ground 😉   We can bring on Gervinho in the unlikely event of our being behind in the final 20 minutes.

There are not too many inventors who have crawled out of the cesspit, but Rowland HIll who established the Penny Post and introduced the postage stamp was born in Tottenham and went to Bruce Castle School, unsurprisingly he died in his home in Hampstead.

In answer to my earlier question of  “Can we beat the milk-livered fops?”, well of course we can. RvP is on fire, Theo has found some strength, we are due a goal from Ramsey, Song has rediscovered his shooting boots and we can score from set pieces. Plus we have the confidence garnered from a 3 game winning run.

I cycled home last night thinking about how many people could get behind London’s sofa  – it will be that kind of game.

COYRRG

BigRaddy


10 Reasons to Feel Optimistic About the North London Derby

October 1, 2011

10 Reasons to Feel Optimistic About the North London Derby

1. We have the world’s number one goalie, as some of us have been saying for months (ahem, some of us, that is, not including me. I was doubtful whether young Szczesney was ready, but his sheer authority and ability this season has shown that I was in the minority for a good reason: I was wrong).

2. We have the BFG. He’s looking more assured every game and I, for one, have been surprised at his tactical and foot baling quality. I was expecting him to be a big solid lump, effective in the air – but he’s much more than that. (And given that the BFG is a Roald Dahl character, it’s interesting that he’ll be up against some other RD characters tomorrow: The Twits.

3. The BFG will be partnered by Alex Dimitri Song Billong, who was absolutely outstanding in the midweek CL game.

4. Even when decimated by injuries, we have players with the power to hurt any opposition. If Theo starts, I expect him to shred them like stir fry vegetables. And just when they think they can’t get any more shredded, we’ll throw in an Oxo cube.

5. We have the best away fans in the country and their mighty noise will be boosted by the acoustics you always find in a public toilet.

6. Robin van Persie is the most in form striker in the world (or maybe just behind Messi). Either way, expect him to bag a brace tomorrow.

7. We are, according to many pundits, the Underdogs. Can you believe that? What does that make them – the Overcnuts? Anyway, I always love it when we’re the underdogs because it’s usually when the Arsenal’s true quality comes through.

8. We have the best manager in the world. They have a tax dodger whose face is made out of melted wax.

9. We have more class than Hackney’s biggest comprehensive. They don’t know the meaning of the word.

10. After the freakish nature of some of our recent results against them (including goal-of-a-lifetime moments from nomark players never heard of again), Lady Luck is due to turn her smile in our direction tomorrow.

RockyLives


									

Ramsey Out?

September 30, 2011

A lot of people have got it in for Aaron Ramsey right now.

Following our victory over Bolton I read several comments on AA and elsewhere to the effect that our young Welshie had a bad game and should be dropped to the stiffs.

Before the match someone even said he was turning into the new Denilson – always passing backwards and sideways as if, having grown up in a rugby-loving country, he was unaware that, with a round ball, you’re allowed to pass forwards.

His short outing in our Champions League win over Olympiacos also drew quite a bit of criticism in the blog world.

Critics have gone so far as to suggest that he needs a spell on loan somewhere, possibly in the Championship.

Opinions are free and everyone is entitled to their own. But the trouble with free things is that often the reason they’re free is that they have no value. And there is no value whatsoever in an opinion that writes off a promising youngster like Aaron Ramsey before his career has even started.

It may seem like AR16 has been with us for quite a while – and in terms of years and months he has, having joined us in the summer of 2008.

But in playing terms he is effectively in his first season, thanks to the bone-snapping attentions of Frankenpulis’s monster.

In his entire Arsenal career Aaron has started only 19 EPL games. He has only started 35 games in all competitions, including the Carling Cup.

Jack Wilshere, by contrast, has started 31 EPL games and 51 in total. He is almost twice as far ahead in his first team development as Aaron despite being a year younger.

None of us can guarantee that a young player will achieve their potential (my mate got himself a Glenn Helder shirt after watching his first game for the Gunners – oh how we laughed in the following weeks). But sometimes you can just see things in teenage prospects that convince you that they are special (in a good way, not in a Gary Neville windscreen-licking kind of way).

Most of us saw it in Wilshere and many of us now see it in Ramsey. Don’t forget that only a couple of weeks ago he was MoTM in the Wales-England international.

Ramsey has composure, drive and a good engine. He can also score goals with well-timed late runs into the danger area.

The prospect of him and Wilshere running our midfield in years to come is mouthwatering.

But he is still in the shallowest foothills of his career and he will make mistakes, will drift out of games and will sometimes have off days.

When he does, surely the right thing to say is “Ramsey had an off day” and not “Ramsey is rubbish,” as I have seen written about him recently.

In short, he is a talented young man who needs support from the Arsenal faithful at this early stage of his development, not people writing off his entire Arsenal career after one or two performances (which, by the way, have been pretty solid all season).

Mark my words, this boy is going to go from lying on the turf at the Britannia Stadium with half his leg missing to being an Arsenal hero of the highest order. From leg end to legend. Just watch, and stop doubting.

RockyLives


Work in progress – Arsenal go marching on

September 29, 2011

We won. Chelsea didn’t. Man City didn’t. Man United didn’t. We did, and that’s the important bit, especially bearing in mind that we had nine injured players and (with the North London Derby coming up) only five genuine first choice players were in the starting XI.

The performance wasn’t the best, but neither was it the worst.  In ignorance, many of us assumed that the champions of Greece would be cannon fodder but by half-time it was clear that our opponents were no mugs. Olympiacos were a well organised, fit and energetic side, with a few dangerous players. They were often the better team in the first half, but the difference between the two sides was the quality of our finishing in the first half and the development of solidity at the back and better ball retention for Arsenal by the second half. The game was very open in the first half, worryingly so at times, since Olympiacos were able to drive into space on the break. We gave plenty of openings to our opponents, whose energy was best exemplified by Mirallas, who made Sagna’s evening a very uncomfortable one.

Both our goals came against the run of play, but came when we transitioned the ball quickly to the front third. The genesis of the first was a bit strange: Oxlade-Chamberlain had possession over on the wing, and decided to sweep a long pass back to Song, who was on the halfway line. Song then looked for the options, and saw Oxlade-Chamberlain had cut inside the Olympiacos right-back and was on a run toward the penalty area. Song pinged the ball back to the Ox with a long aerial pass, the youngster took the ball in his stride confidently, worked it across the penalty area, and efficiently shot back across the goal and through Mellberg’s legs.

The second goal came shortly after, when Santos was put through by efficient combination play from Rosicky and Arshavin; Santos then tried to cross it to Chamakh, but the ball was intercepted. Had it been Clichy, he would have panicked on receiving the ball in that situation and the chance would have been frittered away. But Santos is no fool, he just cut in and took an early right-foot shot that caught the keeper out at the near post.

Olympiacos’s goal came just a little bit later, and was outrageously simple; for two opponents to be able to bring the ball from a corner into the penalty area with barely a challenge made really is unforgivable. And then for Fuster to be able head the ball unchallenged from the penalty spot is very, very poor.  The decision has been taken to switch to zonal marking – fair enough, many pros say it is the better way to defend, and any change in system needs to bed down. But it needs to, and quickly.

In the second half, we exerted our control over proceedings far more effectively. The game became tighter and we became more efficient with and without the ball. We didn’t play with verve but the threat from Olympiacos ebbed away, and we were deserved victors by the end. The only exception to that was when Torosides had a great looping shot that beat Szczesny but clattered against the cross-bar. But that was Olympiacos’s only real chance in the second half, with the Arsenal defence finding itself during the course of the game.  By the end, it was clear that Mertesacker and Song were enjoying their partnership, and Santos showed a wizened way about him.  He knows how to use his body to best effect when contesting possession, and he understands how to anticipate what his opponent is going to do. There are no guarantees Santos will be a success story but those who wrote him off after his first game or two for us should hang their heads in shame.

My marks for the evening:

Szczesny: 7 Did nothing wrong, and made a lovely finger tip save in the first half.  He couldn’t do anything for the goal, when he was criminally exposed by his defence.

Sagna: 4 Constantly bullied, especially by Mirallas, and made several bad decisions while in possession.  Even accounting for the poor cover he got from Arshavin, Sagna’s performance was very disappointing. Perhaps my mark is a bit harsh, but I rate Sagna highly and expect much better from him than this.

Mertesacker: 7 Reads the game so well, he can intercept the ball or break up the play higher up the pitch than one might expect, and with someone like Song to mop up if anything does get through, it does work. The BFG is growing into his role with us, a pleasure to see that.

Song: 7 By the end, an excellent performance from Song, who showed he hasn’t forgotten how to play at CB. He also got an assist for Oxlade-Chamberlain’s goal.

Santos: 7 Lovely to see him score on his home debut, and it was a very mature goal, the result of a steady head. His defending was similarly mature, and the only time we were threatened on his flank was when Torosides swung a leg from distance and almost struck gold.

Frimpong: 5 Had his moments but was often caught out positionally, and for all his huff and puff, he had insufficient impact on Olympiacos.

Arteta: 5 Tried to keep the ball moving and he made some good passes, but Arteta was unable to impose himself on the game. He does offer better set piece delivery than we’ve become used to from Fabregas and van Persie. He also made a crucial goal-line clearance in the first half.

Oxlade-Chamberlain: 7 Slightly lucky for goal as it ricocheted off a defender back to him after a heavy touch, but he did brilliantly well to create the opening and finish it off. The boy has oodles of talent, and more than that, he plays without fear. He’s not intimidated by being crowded by opponents and he’s willing to take them on. The Ox was paid the ultimate compliment when Holebas took him out and was booked, and Holebas should have had a second yellow later on, when Ox killed him for pace, but the referee somehow managed not to see an obvious foul.

Rosicky: 4 Worked hard but to little effect. Had a chance of a shot when laid on by Arshavin but declined, and the opportunity was lost. He did however play a crucial part in the second goal.

Arshavin: 5 Not an athlete, never has been, but that deficiency is showing more now, and it’s not off-set by as many moments of brilliance. But Arshavin was wrongly called offside in first half when would have been through one-on-one. And he brilliantly carved open Olympiacos’s defence with a chipped through ball to Chamakh, who then dragged his shot wide. He also hit the bar with a cross that was wrongly adjudged to have gone out. But he still failed to offer anything consistent, and truth be told, we need more from him.

Chamakh: 5 He had a couple of good chances, and he should have done better with both. But he worked harder than usual (according to the Sky TV caption as he was subbed, Chamakh ran 8.7km as against the team average at 70 minutes of 7.8km). He also created a great chance for Oxlade-Chamberlain in the second half with a defence-splitting pass but AOC shot at the keeper. Chalamkh is rock-bottom in terms of confidence and he’s not streetwise, missing the chance to earn free-kicks when defenders are too tight to him. Crucially, he just doesn’t hunt down the chances to attack the ball in the box. That is his main job, for all of his running.

Subs:

Ramsey: Didn’t impress during his time on the pitch, and with Wilshere now out for so long, we will need Ramsey to step up.

van Persie: Didn’t get a lot of service but also didn’t do much when he did get it.

Gibbs: Did pretty well during his short time on the pitch.

So, all in all, it was ok, but we remain a work in progress. Much of the midfield was huff and puff without end-product tonight, but they can and will do better. We’re on course in the Champions’ League, despite having been drawn in a tough group. Like all competitions this season, the CL is going to be a hard slog, but the second half defensive performance and Oxlade-Chamberlain made this a night that was net positive.

Written by 26may1989


Job Advertisement – Arsenal Football Club are looking for a new: MANAGER

September 27, 2011

Written by Total Arsenal

Due to a recent spell of bad results in the Premier League and the relentless complaining of our fans, we are now looking for a new Manager.

During the reign of Arsène Wenger, Arsenal won three League Championships, Four FA Cups, achieved the cult-status of the Invincibles for a 49-games spell of not getting beat, reached the CL final, played in the CL for 14 consecutive seasons, played a brand of football envied all over the world, and moved successfully to a brand new stadium, whilst keeping the club in a healthy financial position.

Arsenal have just sold their best player, captain and playmaker Cesc Fabregas, and shipped out another 9 players, but we also bought 11 players during the Transfer Window. The new squad is full of youthful talent, experienced players, with a number of national captains, and a top quality spine to the team.

However recent results have been disappointing and we feel our incumbent manager has been far too slow with the integration of the new players – after all he had 21 days since the last day of the TW (including an international break). Arsenal football club had to endure two woeful away games against Manchester United and Blackburn Rovers in the new season, and we have come to the conclusion that the most successful manager in our history is no longer capable of bringing our beloved Arsenal the successes that it is simply entitled to.

We are now looking for a manager who does not complain when his best players are sold, is able to integrate 11 new players into the team in just a few days time, and can bring us instant success (minimum requirement of PL or CL title this season).

HAVE YOU GOT WHAT IT TAKES TO REPLACE ARSENE WENGER, AND MAKE US WIN THE PL AND/OR CL THIS YEAR AND NEXT YEAR AND EVERY YEAR AFTER THAT?

Successful Applicants should be able to demonstrate:

  • A track-record of success (titles, cups, accolades) that equals, or ideally betters that of the incumbent manager.
  • A track-record of prudent financial management/ ability to adhere to the principle of ‘Sustainability’ (in-depth knowledge of Financial Fair Play – FFP – is highly desirable).
  • A vision as well as a track-record of playing attractive, attacking football that is acknowledged all over the world i.e. have you developed a ‘world football brand’ during your spell(s) as a manager?
  • A track-record of integrating two new defenders, a number of midfielders and a new striker in less than 21 days.
  • An ability/track-record of spotting super-talented youth players and develop them into world class players (so we can sell them just before they reach their absolute peaked for loads of money).
  • An ability to recruit undetected quality players in their early twenties at cut prices, and develop them into world class players as well (we like to sell those players too… ).
  • A track-record of protecting the Board that employed/employs you in front of everyone and at whatever personal cost.
  • The ability to stay professional and positive even when your best players let you down, the press is in your face all the time (hoping you will crack at any minute), and your BoD are hiding behind their office chairs when the proverbial hits the fan.
  • Availability at short notice is a MUST.

If you believe, you have what it takes to be successful in this role then please get in touch with the major shareholder Stan Kroenke, by emailing him at: silentstanny@arsenalfornow.com

If this position is not for you, but you know of somebody who has got what it takes, please let us know the name of him/her and their contact details, including a summary of why you believe they would be excellent candidates.

TotalArsenal


At Last: A Real Captain for Arsenal

September 26, 2011

If there is one image that defines the revival that Arsenal are about to embark on, it’s this one:

There were many positives to take from our dispatching of Bolton Wanderers on Saturday but, for me, this was the one that really counted.

Robin van Persie, mobbed by a herd of Bolton spongiforms, didn’t give an inch. When they mooed in his face he bellowed back at them; when they jostled him he put out his arms as if to say: “Yeah? And what?” He stood his ground. He faced down the bullocks with a show of real bollocks.

If anyone doubted whether Robin was the man to lead this team, that moment should put their mind at ease.

For Alan Hansen to subsequently criticise him on Match of the Day for not ‘leading by example’ and not being captain material tells you a lot more about Hansen than about van Persie. And it also tells you that he probably watched no more of our game than the brief highlights that were shown on MoTD.

Devout Christians sometimes use the question “what would Jesus do?” as a method to guide their actions.

At Arsenal we used to have a Jesus. His name was Cesc Fabregas. And if you ask what Cesc/Jesus would have done in that scenario, I offer the following speculation:

1) The scenario would not have happened in the first place because Cesc/Jesus, seeing a Wanderers player poleaxed in the box, would have put the ball into touch.
2) But if it had happened, and Cesc/Jesus was mobbed by a thousand pounds of Bolton beef, he would have backed off and walked away.

I’m not saying that either course of action by Cesc/Jesus is wrong. But Robin’s actions were those of a warrior. And by heaven, we have needed a warrior of late.

It may mean that Cesc is a nicer and more sporting person, but it also means that Robin is more of a fighter, someone who would rather be the winning guy than the nice guy.

To continue the religious analogy, if Cesc was Jesus, Robin is the Archangel Michael – the field commander of God’s armies in the war against the devil, with the title “Prince of Angels”.

Prince Robin. That will do for me and that is how I will refer to him from now on.

You may think I’m reading too much into one brief incident, but sometimes fortunes in football hinge on such intangibles. We all talk about confidence, desire, mental strength, morale – well, they are influenced by moments like this.

Prince Robin acted the way a Keown or a Vieira would have done. He handled it probably even better than his compatriot Dennis would have (I suspect Dennis might have chinned one of the cow-faces and got himself red carded).

But Prince Robin kept his arms down and spread wide in a gesture that both ridiculed the ox-minded simpletons of Bolton and ensured that the ref could not accuse him of violent conduct (Gervinho and Diaby, please take note).

He refused to be intimidated.

It’s this kind of leadership that is essential to helping us regain our status as one of the top teams in the country, capable of competing in all competitions and making our opponents believe that we are no pushover.

Cesc was a brilliant player – one of the best midfielders I have ever seen. But he was not a captain. Nor was Gallas and nor was Thierry Henry for all his gifts.

Arsene Wenger thinks we Brits place too much emphasis on the role of captain, but he’s wrong. A real leader on the field can make the crucial difference at the margins between success and failure.

And I really believe that Prince Robin is a leader. His public utterances of late have carried the weight and maturity of someone who knows he is in charge. He supports his team mates but is not afraid to remind them about what’s expected of them. He does not try to say everything in the garden is rosy – but he also refuses to accept that it’s all manure.

Quite possibly it is only his appalling luck with injuries that has stopped van Persie from becoming captain much earlier in his Arsenal career.

Having a striker as captain is not necessarily ideal, but there have been some outstanding srtiker-captains in the past (Shearer, Rummenigge, Maradona to name but three). And our No 10 is really showing leadership on and off the field.

This new Arsenal team is beginning to take shape. There is much to improve on and I don’t expect to see our best until the second half of the season. But the pieces are beginning to fall into place.

And no piece is more important than our new captain.

Prince Robin, I’m your man.

RockyLives