Is it right to push for Wenger’s departure?

May 11, 2011

Written by TotalArsenal

Your dreams are china in your hand…………………..

‘Don’t push too far your dreams are china in your hand’. The lyrics of this well-known, and somewhat tacky song by T’pau in 1987, came to my mind when I read recent comments regarding Arsène Wenger’s position on a variety of Arsenal websites. The song is (roughly) based on what happened to Mary Shelley after she published her world-famous book ‘Frankenstein’. Her enormous success created dissent and jealousy in her marriage and friendship, and in a way, she created her own monster. Are we perhaps pushing our Arsenal dream of winning major titles and being a world force in football too far at the moment?

It seems we have arrived at a crossroads. Most if not all of us, expect Arsenal too push harder for trophies and are not happy with our achievements in recent years. Quite a few are even calling for Arsène’s head as they are unhappy about his recent decisions on players he bought and/or nurtured, his (lack of) tactical nous at times, his chosen style of football etc, etc. However, there are also still a lot of supporters who would like to give Arsene at least another year, and there are even still a few who passionately argue that he has done very well, given the budgetary restraints since we moved to the Emirates, and that there is no problem at all.

Should we aim to push Wenger out, so we can give our desperate dream of winning major trophies another and different impetus? Or, should we be a bit more content with what we have achieved, and trust a man with a great vision to finally deliver the silverware? And, is there a risk we could push too far and too hard and as a result shatter the china once and for all?

What would be the benefits of Arsène Wenger leaving?

  • The biggest initial benefit would be that scintillating feeling of a new beginning, of renewed hope. It has been a frustrating few years for most Arsenal fans, caused for a big part by our incredibly high expectations. More and more of us are complaining about the annual ‘Déjà vu’ syndrome. Recent seasons have shown a similar pattern towards the final months: during the course of a few weeks we lose out on all the trophies, and everybody gets depressed again. A new manager, with a few new signings and a few departures would, at least for the time being, fill our hearts with hope again.
  • There would probably be fewer arguments, over time, between the pro-Wenger and anti-Wenger brigades: so maybe a bit more harmony between the fans.
  • Success cannot be bought automatically, but by recruiting the likes of Guardiola, Mourinho, or Rijkaard our chances of winning trophies would probably increase, although there are no guarantees! And, if we were to attract these kinds of top managers, would the club be prepared/capable to give them the large sums of money they require in order to deliver the coveted trophies?

What would be the risks of Arsène Wenger leaving?

  • The biggest risk is that whoever becomes the new manager, does not achieve instant success and we do not qualify for the Champions League in 2012-2013 and, possibly, beyond. Wenger, despite significantly increased competition over recent years, has been a safe pair of hands in keeping us in the CL. As we all know, this is of vital importance both for our finances as well as our ability to hold on to, and recruit, the best players.
  • Key players could decide they want to leave when Wenger leaves (to join him at his new club, or just leave).
  • We could become pragmatic and result-orientated and our style of football is sacrificed as a result (ok, I am being subjective here, but I am quite sure this will matter to a lot gooners).
  • We could become one of the many clubs who keep changing their manager every 1-3 years because it is just not working out (look at Real Madrid, Liverpool, Chelsea, Bayern Munich, Milan, Inter etc etc).
  • As a result, we could even become a mid-table team who cannot get into the top-4 anymore for a long, long time.

This simple, and quickly produced, and I am sure by no means complete, benefits and risks analysis shows there are simply no guarantees that either Arsene Wenger’s staying or leaving will lead to trophies. In my view, the risks are higher than the benefits, but that does not mean we should not opt for change. We could take the risk just to make us feel better, and push our dream to the limit: all or nothing? But be aware, that if the dream gets shattered it could take a long, long time before we will be up there again. We could be on our way to producing our own ‘monster’.

Or we could stick with what we have and give Arsène Wenger one more chance, back off a bit, and let him complete his mission. Nobody puts more pressure on Arsène then he does himself, and recent adversity will only help him to focus on what needs changing to make the final step to success. Personal growth, managerial achievements and trophies for the club do not only depend on the manager’s ability to develop a vision, to lead and to dominate (which Arsène has in abundance), but occasional doubt, humility and willingness to make changes are just as important.

I am absolutely convinced that, after a short period of reflection and consultation with key people inside our club, he will make significant changes this summer.

A few weeks ago, I was adamant that Arsène should go: that it was time for change. Having thought hard and long about it, I now believe we should wholeheartedly give him another crack at the whip.

TotalArsenal.

218 Comments | Uncategorized | Tagged: , , , | Permalink
Posted by peachesgÖÖner

Hundredth Anniversary of St Totteringham’s Day (And Its Origins)

May 10, 2011

On Saturday we celebrated St Totteringham’s Day.

I know, I know, this was supposed to be the season when the pribbling, flap-mouthed fustilarians* from N17 would overcome the Forces of Light and begin a reign of darkness and terror.

Just like last year.

And the year before. And before that. And so on.

In fact the very first St Totteringham’s Day was celebrated exactly a century ago in the 1910/11 season.  It was the Lily Livereds’ second season in the top flight and they were quick to establish what would become a long pattern of inferiority, finishing in 15th position (five places below a decidedly average Woolwich Arsenal).

In the century that has passed since, we have celebrated this happy occasion no fewer than 47 times. The figure would be much higher but for the fact that our faltering neighbours have had a habit of dropping out of the top flight from time to time. Well, that and the interventions of The Kaiser and Mr Hitler: in both World Wars regular league football was suspended.

Of course there have been some years when, despite the possibility of there being a St Totteringham’s Day, it never happened.

In those years the sun seldom shone, people talked of a foul miasma in the air, dogs whelped in the streets, livestock were struck barren and crops were visited by pestilential blight.

Thankfully we have not had to suffer such ill times for 16 full and happy years. Indeed many of the current Arsenal squad are too young to have any memory of those dark days.

Nevertheless, it’s worth reminding ourselves of the origins of this important festival.

St Totteringham himself was a strange figure, dating from the Middle Ages.

I have borrowed the following short biography from Butler’s Lives of the Saints:

Totteringham was born in a swampy, unhealthy hamlet some six miles north of Charing Cross in the year 1401AD. He always believed it was auspicious to have entered this world in a year that ended with a 1.  A bent and weasly man of ill favoured visage, he nevertheless gained a small group of followers by foretelling a glorious future that would soon be visited upon him and those who believed in him. “Next year,” he would chant as he walked in robes of all white, “Next year. Yea, our time will come. One day! One day! One day!” His piety was such that people, even in his lifetime, came to refer to him as “Saint” Totteringham.

However, after more than three decades of such prophesy his followers did cease to believe him and, in their great disappointment, exacted a terrible revenge. He was beaten severely then strapped to the foremost part of a bombard [a medieval cannon], which was then fired. Most of his human remains were never found, having been shot straight out of his robe. The robe itself was bloodily stained in the body (where the cannonball had impacted) but the white sleeves remained miraculously unmarked. His erstwhile followers adopted this red-body-white-sleeves as their preferred form of apparel thenceforth as a refutation of all that “Saint” Totteringham had stood for. A clerical inquiry subsequently disclosed that Totteringham, far from being a pious man, had in fact been a swindler, a fraud and a tax evader. He also had a twitch. Consequently, despite having been ‘cannoned’ he was never cannonised, though the saintly prefix remains to this day as an ironic title and a reminder to others not to follow false prophets.

So there you have it.

We Gunners may all have our differences, we may disagree about what’s best for our wonderful club. But we can all join together to wish each other a Very Happy St Totteringham’s Day.

*  pribbling: ignorant and weak

fustilarian: a low fellow, a stinkard, a scoundrel

Definitions from the Dictionary of Elizabethan Insults

RockyLives

167 Comments | Uncategorized | Tagged: , , , , | Permalink
Posted by RockyLives

THIS is The Arsenal, and THAT wasn’t good enough.

May 9, 2011

I sat down in front of the game at 14.05 (kick off times are getting stranger and stranger), with a sense of optimism. I know that’s my default setting but I had good reason. We had got the monkey off our backs by beating ManYoo at home, right? A clean sheet against the league leaders last time and our superior record on the road this season led me to believe that we could get something. Stoke would also be preoccupied with their forthcoming date with destiny at Wembley, wouldn’t they?

A first half where we dominated possession, but failed to hit the target when we chanced a shot, and ended up going in at half-time 2 goals down ensued. There was, as always, some attractive link play with some individual flourishes, but in the end our performance was cosmetic, Stoke’s was surgical. There were positives: Arshavin trying to tackle back and RvP leading the line with spirit spring to mind but as the game wore on an image started to form… Stoke were playing like George Graham’s Arsenal side on their Cup Winner’s Cup run. They won every tackle, every aerial ball and shepherded our players back away from the danger zones. The team defended as a unit and wasted little time in turning defence into attack. And we had nothing to offer as a riposte, no tactics, no spirit. We couldn’t even muster a man on the near post for the set piece that led to their first goal!

Second half and Wenger brings on both Bendtner and Chamakh for Arshavin and Ramsey respectively. A bold move from the manager, who I have often urged to make earlier subs. But the combination of these two with RvP has yet to work in any game it has been tried and it smacked of desperation. And so it came to pass, or rather, we failed to pass well in the second half, conceding possession and trying to play Stoke at their own game. The futility of this approach got me seething as every dead ball situation was wasted, crosses didn’t reach their targets and Stoke cut out every threat with determination.

A lot has been said about Stoke’s approach to football, but what I saw was a far better team than the Allardyce-esque team of last season. They are confident, well-organised, neat and efficient. They can play ball to feet or in the air and allow very few risks to their own goal whilst causing our defence a real headache or two… from Pennant, Jones and Walters in particular, all of whom got on the scoresheet. I, personally, was filled with a hateful admiration of their strength and their belief in their game plan- I supported a team very like it 18 years ago!

Throwing yet more caution to the wind, the renowned game changer Tomas Rosicky came on for Alex Song in the 80th minute and shortly afterwards our best player on the day was finally played into enough space to score from just to the right of the penalty spot. “Thank the gods for Robin Van Persie”, I thought, hoping against hope that we could turn it on in the final 10 minutes. With that hope rekindled, I turned back to the screen to see Djourou floundering against Walters in our own box and instantly restoring the 2 goal advantage. Hope shattered, and so did my chair which will be kindling itself now I’ve kicked it to pieces!

I turned it off and walked out into the sunshine in disgust. If anything of note happened after that, please let me know in the comments. I had a fury towards this team that I cannot quite rationalize. Why should I be so upset when the actual result of the game was unlikely to mean anything? I put it down to 3 reasons:

Firstly, the team whose style of play I actually identified with was the opposition’s. I understood their formation, their strategy and desire. Their mentality was admirable and they played as a team with a common sense of purpose. Someone in the comments yesterday said that if we had Shawcross and Huth at CB we would have won the league. I am not sure that is the case. Neither of those players are better that JD and Kozzer in my view. The difference was the coaching they have received and the “no-one shall pass us” mentality that has been instilled.

Secondly, our team’s style of play- with heads dropping once the first goal went in- with the emphasis on individual skill and “trying to play football” yet getting turned over by a proper team of (less skillful) professionals reminded me of a team I have always hated. Yep, you’ve guessed it, they who shall not be named from down the road. We cannot continue in this vein. We are The Arsenal. We are in the business of winning games. The result is more important than the manner in which it is achieved. Were it the other way round, we’d go weak at the knees for players wearing lillywhite! (If we can win with style, so much the better and I will always be grateful to our current manager for having managed to do so for so long, but…)

Finally, it was evident from the way the players communicated with the referee and the way their heads dropped that we have a “victim culture” developing in the dressing room. This has got to stop. The worst tackles yesterday were perpetrated by OUR players, yet from the almost whinging way some of our players pleaded with the referee I discern that they felt it was the other way round. It was not a dirty game yesterday, but you could see that some of our players were saying to themselves. “not fair” like sulky teenagers.

I am angry, and I am sure it will pass. It always does. I love the club but the tactics in particular, and the heart and determination in general HAVE to improve. This is The Arsenal and THAT wasn’t good enough!

Written by CarlitoII

220 Comments | Uncategorized | Tagged: , , , | Permalink
Posted by Carlito11

Ramsey’s return for a game of football

May 8, 2011

What sort of reception will young Ramsey receive at the Potteries today?  Will it be a” well done lad upon recovering from a dreadful injury?”   What do you expect from the superb fans at Stoke – according to Sky Sports who regularly tell me about the marvelous atmosphere. We know better – they are pond-life, requiring amplification of their offensive chanting in order to create an atmosphere in their half empty stadium.

I think it important to insist that this game is not about Shawcross/Ramsey, it is about Arsenal doing all they can to gain 3 valuable points against a team who have caused problems in the past. Unfortunately, the focus of the media will be all about our young Welshman’s return to the scene of Shawcross’s grievous assault.

Even more than usual the referee is going to be a central figure in creating the tone of today’s game. Halsey is a decent ref, even handed and experienced, plus we tend to do well when he officiates (may I recommend Untold Arsenal’s well researched Ref Watch).  If Stoke start the game as I expect with a flurry of strong, “let them know you are there” tackles which go unpunished, we could be in for a long 90 minutes, however should Halsey , in what is likely to be his final game as a PL ref, stamp his authority upon the perps, we could flourish.

Injuries to our creative players will deny Mr Wenger the chance to play an expansive game though we have talent in such depth that their absence shouldn’t hinder us too much. Could any other team lose 3 International attacking MF’s and still put out such an effective midfield?

You know what to expect from Stoke, and theirs is just the style of play to upset us. Arsenal’s record of goals conceded from set plays is alarming and we must hope for a fit Djourou alongside Koscielny. The strength of Szczesny will be important today , he cannot stay on his line with all the crosses and throw-ins which will arrive into our box. There is rumour about Vermælen making his PL return and should JD be unfit I would welcome his return,however this is tempered by a total lack of competitive football – 90 minutes of reserve team action is no preparation for a team with a playing style like Stoke.

On the ground Kenwyne Jones is a major threat; in a decent team he could flourish (ours?), that said, he is just the type of player Kos likes to defend against. Koscielny has been improving throughout the season and shows excellent tactical awareness, plus he is very good at linking defence and attack.

I think Arshavin will be the key to unlocking Stoke’s defence. The meerkat is so clever and against MU showed an appetite for work we haven’t seen from him  before. More of the same please ,Andrei.

My team:

What I do not want to see is at  70 minutes with a one goal lead AW shoring up the defence. Many on AA have written about the withdrawal of Walcott towards the end of the game and how this affects our ability to counter-attack a team committed to attack. I detest this tactic, it reeks of fear, when one up, go for two, when two up go for three. Did it help at Newcastle, Spurs etc etc to put on another defender?

Stoke have yet to lose at home in 2011 and are in a decent run of form, furthermore they have won 5 0f their last 6 home games against Arsenal; they will not want to get beaten prior to the Cup Final next week, however with this game in mind they may not give it 100% gas. Arsenal have scored the most away goals and have  the best away record in the PL.

This is going to be another tough game but one to which the Song/Ramsey/Wilshire should be suited. Counter-attacking at pace will be the key.

Bruno Brookes and Peter Wyngarde come from Stoke ……… ’nuff said!

COYRRG

Written by BigRaddy

206 Comments | Uncategorized | Tagged: , , , | Permalink
Posted by Erik the Red

Arsenal, the best of times………the worst of times

May 7, 2011

Written by Geoff Strong

During the 17 seasons from 1930 to 1953 (excluding the war years), Arsenal Football Club won 7 league titles, 3 FA Cups  and had only 7 barren seasons, never waiting more than 3 seasons for a trophy (of which there were only two per year). A golden age, the best of times.

Over the past 13 years we have won 3 league titles (one invincible), 5 times runners-up, 4 FA Cups (2 doubles), a Champions League final and not one season outside of the top four. Another golden age, the best of times ?

The past 13 years have also produced 8 barren years, including the last 5, not 6 until the fat bloke (without a shirt) sings. The worst of times? With continued involvement in the Champions League and being thereabouts in all competitions every year, how can this be the worst of times?

Well, for those who became Arsenal fans over the last 20 odd years this is their longest wait for a trophy. First George Graham and now Arsene Wenger raised their expectations and unfulfilled expectation brings disappointment and despair, for them these are the worst of times and for some the latest golden age ended in 2004/05. Many, before the season started, confidently predicted that we would drop out of the top four, and despite the team exceeding their expectations continue to call for Arsene to be sacked. They really must believe these are the worst of times.

They don’t know what it was like to stand on the North Bank in a crowd of just over 4500 watching us lose 3-0 to Leeds (well that’s only half true as I used to watch the first half from the clock end and then walk round to the North Bank at half time), going to the 1969 League Cup Final at Wembley against 3rd Division Swindon, armed with my double page souvenir picture of   # Viva Bobby Gould, Viva #  , full of expectation of our first trophy in 16 years, the first in my lifetime……..having to go to school on Monday, the worst of times.

Are we still in a golden age, the best of times? For me the answer is yes, never before in my lifetime have Arsenal been competing for so long at the very top level. Arsène’s youth policy has unearthed some genuine talent who I hope will be the foundation of our side for years to come. For me it is “job done” following the move to the Emirates, now it’s time to move on to the next stage. Arsène, bring in those two or three players to add that little extra we need (I know you are looking). Some players will go this summer to make way, some of whom joined us at a very young age, to them I say thank you for being a part of a squad that has kept us in the top echelon of European football in times of financial restraint.

So, fellow sufferers, try to enjoy the ride (it’s always a bit bumpy with Arsenal) and remember that to be really disappointed you have to have believed success was possible before it was snatched from you. Keep that belief for when success comes it will be that much sweeter.

But this is just my view………..

The best of times or the worst of times?

126 Comments | Uncategorized | Tagged: , , , | Permalink
Posted by peachesgÖÖner

Shopping for new players – it’s a cinch !

May 6, 2011

 

Whilst looking enviously on at those teams lucky enough to be in the Champions League semi finals, and of course being repulsed by the theatrics of the cheating/diving/referee harassment at the Bernabeu last week, one other thing cropped up in my mind.

Last summer the clamour for a quality goalie had led to suggestions that we replace one Manuel(Almunia) with another (Neuer) as well as other likely lads to go in goal for us, Stekelenburg, Given and Reina. Reina, it has since transpired, was the subject of a serious bid from us according to Bob Wilson, and not the much loved by tabloid hacks “an unnamed source within the club”.

While the Schalke keeper performed a sterling job in keeping the indigo (scabby) nosed Glaswegians mob to just two goals ahead last week his showing on Wednesday was less than stellar.

I’m sure we can all easily imagine at least two of the four goals being conceded by our Manuel and the outrage from our support would be no less vicious than it was after West Brom away, for example.

It raises the question of how much Neuer’s value has fallen after those high profile clangers and perhaps how we are better off sticking with a known quantity in Chesney.

It’s fair for the fan base to clamour for signings in areas of the pitch where we are thin on the gorund numbers wise and quality wise but what is apparent is that buying a player is not just like ordering an item off Amazon(other web-based retail sites are available) – you find someone you like, then “add to cart”.

Not only does he have to be available, he has to want to join us and his place in the squad must be clarified(first choice, back up or squad player) – I sense Wenger is the sort of man who would honour such promises made by a prospective signing so he may well be ham strung by this “inconvenient” ethic.

Somehow I feel N17’s tax dodger may not have such qualms about players arriving on false pretences…allegedly and IMHO.

After these considerations there is the sticky issue of valuation, which I will swerve around as the arguments for how much cash we do – or do not – have has been done to death and beyond.

What I also feel is that there is a touch of what I call “Other teams players” syndrome, whereby the good other teams players do is exaggerated and the worth of our present players is down played.

This is not to say squad complacency should be tolerated but the disproportionate praising of another teams player, who some Arsenal fans can’t help but feel are better BECAUSE they play for someone else, is what rankles.

A feverish summer of transfer speculation awaits and it may seem a tad premature to focus on this with three critical games left but I’m just imagining the flak that Neuer would have got had he performed for us as he did for Schalke and the slating our club would have got.

The red tops would, in their usual knee jerk fashion, have labelled our new keeper a dud and proclaimed our transfer strategy as proof of Wenger’s senility.

177 Comments | Uncategorized | Tagged: , , , | Permalink
Posted by ChärybdÏß1966

Looking at Jack Wilshere’s U21 Call-Up From All Angles

May 5, 2011

“I will never say no to my country.”

So Jack Wilshere has vowed.

We all know the story by now. The European U21 Championship takes place this summer. Stuart Pearce has included Wilshere in his provisional 40-man squad for the trip to Denmark in June, there is absolutely no doubt he will make the squad and the starting XI. As you all know (in case my username isn’t a giveaway) I am Irish so I come at this 100% from an Arsenal point of view and want Jack to rest up and play the tourney on his Xbox this summer. However, I respect that the majority here are English, and while a lot, if not all, would put club over country in this case, that you want your country to do as well as possible, and having Wilshere in the squad will do that. Instead of rambling on, I will set out the arguments each side has for Jack going or staying.

Arsene Wenger — Arsenal

Jack Wilshere is 19 years old and has had his first full season as a senior starter under his belt. He has played 52 (FIFTY TWO!!) times for his club and country already this season. That would take the wind out of the best of seasoned players, never mind a young man who is barely old enough not to be called a teenager. During this time, he has taken on massive responsibility in our midfield. Personally, I can’t remember why he came into the squad, was it an injury? Was it because he did so well at Bolton? Was it tactical? All I know is he came in and played like he has been a senior for years. Playing against the likes of Xavi and Iniesta, and with the likes of Fabregas and Rooney (for England) hasn’t daunted him. He demands the ball, and he is not shy in trying to win it.

So Wenger has one question to ask himself when pondering Jack’s trip to Denmark; “What will he learn?” The answer is “nothing.” He already has all the technical ability, he won’t learn from those around him or those he is up against. He is already considered a main player for Arsenal so will not upgrade his responsibility chart. All Wenger cares about is Arsenal, and Wilshere’s trip to Denmark is nothing but a headache to him.

Stuart Pearce — England 

Just as Wenger’s considerations are all about Arsenal, so Stuart Pearce’s are all about England’s U21. He is not managing them to be friends with club managers, he is there to get the best out of who he can select, and Jack Wilshere is the best he can select. Pearce’s argument is very easy to see, yes he realizes that Jack has played a lot this season, but he also realizes that Jack is one of the best young talents in world football right now and not taking him would be madness. If Wilshere is tired after the tournament its not Pearce’s problem but Wenger’s, of course it could also be Capello’s problem. What is good for the England U21s might not be good for the Senior squad. What good will an exhausted Jack Wilshere be to you in Poland and the Ukraine next year?

Jack Wilshere

There is no doubting this is a fine young man we have on our hands at Arsenal. There was some stories early last season that he was getting a bit big for his boots, a few months at Bolton sorted that out (one of Wenger’s best loan decisions in my opinion) and you know he will always give a 100% for whoever he plays for, and he wants to play for England. Following his Twitter, Jack takes huge pride in being English, and unlike some other players who will claim man flu to get out of an international game, Jack will play whenever and wherever needed.

He sees the tournament in Denmark as a major one and one where he can lead his country. He is playing as well these last few weeks as he had been at the start so obviously he doesn’t feel tired, however its how he feels after the tournament that matters. It would be very sad that a young man who wants to do right by his country could set his career back a bit next season by getting exhausted and perhaps dropped by Wenger for the first few games.

Hopefully it doesn’t come to this. I  fully expect Jack to be in Denmark in June and in the starting XI, and while I wish England’s U21s all the best, I won’t hide my happiness if they get knocked out early and Jack is on the beach having a nice rest for the remainder of the summer.

Written by Irishgunner

122 Comments | Uncategorized | Tagged: , , , , | Permalink
Posted by criochnaithe

Arsenal’s Smaller Squad in 2011/12?

May 4, 2011

We always say we support any player who dons the prestigious Red & White shirt, but is this really true? In all honesty, what were your thoughts when Mr. Wenger took off Theo on Sunday to replace him with Eboue?  Come on – be honest!

I can tell you my reaction, it was dismay. Not purely as a response to AW’s frustrating habit of trying to defend a lead (more of that another time) but because I really thought I had seen the last of Mr. Eboue in an Arsenal shirt. Following his almost unbelievable gifting of two points to Liverpool and single-handedly derailing our PL chances (OK that is an exaggeration!), I firmly believed his AFC career was over. Clearly Mr Wenger disagrees.

This post is not specifically anti-Eboue, who has given sterling service to the club but sadly is out of his depth, rather it is a glance at why Mr Wenger persists with players who are  not good enough to win us the title.

We have players in the squad who are on huge wages and are clearly not value for money. You know who I mean; there are players on loan who will not make the grade, we have a mass of youngsters who will never earn the kind of wages they are being paid on their current Arsenal contracts and we have established stars who are not earning their daily bread.

Last week Arseblog highlighted the difficulties of selling players who earn wages that lesser clubs cannot match, thus we have to wait until their contracts expire and allow them to leave without a transfer fee – how does this help our situation? All Arsenal’s investment in time, coaching and wages goes to another club for nothing.

Yet this situation has been created by Mr Wenger’s Project Youth and his understandable fear that the quality players will move on if not bound by contract. The Flamini fiasco gave him clear evidence of player power when running down a contract.

Our squad is bottom heavy with too few real world class players and too many players with “potential.” Most AFC fans know the stats, we have one of the cheapest squads yet one of the highest paid. This has to change.

How will AW respond? Will he swallow the losses and sell players in the manner of Man City  i.e. we continue to pay a percentage of their wages. It would stick in the craw but at least they would not be available for selection.

So, will my hopes be dashed by seeing Eboue in our Anniversary shirt or will some kind (and blind) Coach sign him in summer? What has become clear is that AW will not win another PL title with players like Eboue and Denilson in the squad. We need some extensive pruning, and there will be many worried (but rich) players in summer.

Written by BigRaddy

122 Comments | Uncategorized | Tagged: , , , , , , | Permalink
Posted by Erik the Red

Fabregas “Disliked” By Teammates

May 3, 2011

This post is based on a conversation between one of the Arsenal Arsenal regular contributors and two individuals loosely connected with our club. It took place before Sunday’s game against Manchester United.

I would not normally pass on unsubstantiated comments, but Carlito11 (the AA regular) is a mature and responsible informant and he believes there is no reason to doubt what he was told.

In Carlito’s own words: “I had an interesting meet up pre-match with a couple of youngish foreign lads who were both qualified UEFA coaches and, more interestingly, mates of one of our first teamers. They divulged (but were keen not to be leaking) that our captain is not particularly well liked in the dressing room and is seen as thinking himself better than the others.”

At this point, if you object in principle to the reporting of second hand intelligence, then I understand and I expect you will stop reading.

But what struck me about Carlito’s information was how plausible it felt, for two reasons:

  • Cesc’s demeanour and body language has been quite negative at times this season. He has not looked as if he is enjoying his football. In fact, sometimes he looks like he’s carrying the world on his shoulders. I know this is not scientific, but it’s my gut feeling from having watched him over several years.
  • The much talked-about mental fragility of our team this season seems, to me, to betoken some sort of inner conflict within the squad. If the players were united as one, I believe they would fight harder for each other. I realise I am speculating here, but, again, it’s a gut feeling.

If it’s true that at least some of the players do not like Cesc it’s a pretty sad state of affairs – and maybe gives some extra weight to Arsene Wenger’s comments last week that the captaincy had been a burden on him.

Not that it’s essential to like your captain. I don’t suppose many of the Manchester United players liked Roy Keane when he was captain, but they certainly respected and feared him and would do what he told them.

My worry with Cesc is that his teammates probably don’t fear him either. Presumably they respect him for his footballing abilities (and for being a World Cup winner) but is that enough?

This has been a strange season for our captain, coming after a summer of constant speculation about his desire to move to the Catalonian National Diving Team followed by that WC win.

People have been quick to blame his demeanour on a desire to be elsewhere. I don’t think it’s as simple as that. I believe he is passionate about Arsenal, and even more so about his manager.

But maybe it’s another reason why he has seemed remote to his colleagues. What might seem arrogance to others may just be preoccupation or distraction. I would be surprised if Cesc really feels himself to be better than his teammates – but it’s a problem if that’s how it seems to some of them.

Either way, if this reported issue has any grounding in truth it is incumbent on the manager to deal with it. We thought we had rid ourselves of most of our dressing room squabbles with the departures of Adebarndooor and Wee Willie Gallas.

My solution (it’s easy being an armchair quarterback) would be for Arsene to persuade Cesc to relinquish the armband next season to concentrate on his own game.

I mentioned in comments at the weekend the most famous example of this strategy working: in 1989 Ian Botham gave up the captaincy of the England cricket team after 12 straight Test defeats. His next Test as an ordinary member of the team? Against Australia at Headingley, where he almost single-handedly destroyed the Aussies on the way to recapturing the Ashes for England.

Crucially, Cesc would have to give up the captaincy, not have it taken from him. We want him to be at his best for us and we certainly should not want him to leave. I keep reading comments about how Arsenal should cash in and sell him this summer.

If he really, really wants off, then maybe that’s fair enough. But if we can keep him we should – and here’s why:

Our win rate this season in EPL games in which Cesc started: 62% (with 24% draws and only 14% losses).

Our win rate in games Cesc did not start: 43% (with 36% draws and 21% losses).*

We need Cesc because we are better with him in the team.

But we also need to be united in the dressing room.

Harmony is not just a hairspray. It’s also an important ingredient of most successful teams.

RockyLives (with thanks to Carlito 11)

* I included the game in which Cesc went off injured after 14 minutes in the list of games he did not start.

209 Comments | Uncategorized | Tagged: , , , , | Permalink
Posted by RockyLives

Arsenal Foyle United Charge …. Report and player ratings

May 2, 2011

Written by Harry

They arrived battered, bruised, down trodden and weary, yearning for the season to end and for the summer holidays to start so they can relax and think about how close we have come again to the title to see it ebb away at the death, to plan the changes required, and that’s just the fans……..

The players though, although desperately weary after suffering so much in the last few months, still had to show the fans, the boss and the watching public that we do have something about us, that we can battle and that we can win against United……4 games to ensure that we push Chelsea all the way and also don’t let City still get 3rd from us…..

I sat down in my seat just as the team came out and lined up to shake hands, then the announcer reminded us all what their names were again, hang on Cesc was missing, but Aaron was in the middle instead, an injury in training yesterday it transpired later?

Arsenal started very brightly and had all the early play, United on the other hand had come with their usual game play that Fergie has adopted for last 4 or 5 years against us….Sit, hold and contain and play at speed on the break, with an added secret ingredient of Ji Sung Park, who seems to be Old Red Nose’s, ace up his sleeve, well so he thinks…..

As Arsenal stroked the ball around in the afternoon sun, Walcott was having some joy down the right early doors, one cross came in and United’s defence struggled to clear, Vidic weakly poked the ball out, only as far as Jack, who lashed a wild shot wide of the RH post…..In the seasons to come that ball will nestle in the net nicely……..But it showed our intentions……

The game, as usual between us, had a nasty undertone to it, that threatened to boil over, especially with Shrek intent on moaning throughout at every decision that didn’t go Uniteds way and he continually asked the ref to book players, either that or he was asking Chris Foy, how old his mum was…….

Next moment of interest, saw Nasri trying to break free from Fabio, who was insisting that he fouled Nasri at every opportunity, but the ball broke and Clichy picked it up at pace, he strode forward and put the ball across low into the danger area, Walcott got in between Vidic and Evra, and managed to get a leg on it but could not keep it down…

Moments later, a delightful lob pass was taken through by Jack on his chest, ball down, across the area to the incoming Walcott only for Evra to get to it first…..

Then Nasri, jinks forward pushes the ball into Jacks path, who heads into the box only to be upended on the edge by Vidic, Foy looks over to Fergie and waves play on…..A 100% nailed on free kick…….

Uniteds first chance came about midway when Nani pushed down the right, Clichy held him up but he dinked a sweet ball through to Fabio, who ran into the box, he pulled it back across for Hernandez, but the Sagman, got infront and cleared the ball away for a corner, for me a key moment, as previously when we have had such possession, we have had the tendency to concede on United’s first real chance, Fabio really was given too much room and wasn’t tracked by anyone….

Next really key moment was after an interchange of passes from Ramsey and Van Persie, saw Ramsey put Theo away down the right, delightful cross as RVP rose to head home, Vidic had the urge for a toilet break and put his hand up, the ref said no and play on, it’s the only reasoning I can give for getting no decision, as the aggrieved RVP furiously blasted the assistant on the right.  Should have been a penalty and a red card………Both officials had a cleared view……..poor……

Just before half time, the president of the GILF club, pushed Wilshere to the ground wide out on the left touchline and picked up a yellow…..

The only other thing worth noting from the first half action was that Chris Foy managed to break up Arsenal attacking play 3times!!! By getting in the way…….Which really irked the crowd, who for once played their part in the game and maintained a reasonable atmosphere, I was sitting in North Bank Upper for a change, instead of the clock end.

A change at half time as Nasri was replaced by Arshavin due to Injury……..

Early doors 2nd half and United got a free kick, which had Sczszesny at full stretch to keep a Rooney curler out….

Sagna then had a dig from outside the area, just wide of the far post….

As United repelled another attack, Song intercepted, the ball fell to Ramsey’s feet, he turned and played Van Persie down the right, he continued down the right and into their box, for once we had 3 on the 6yard area, but Ramsey had continued his run, he held his arms aloft and shouted for the ball, RVP dragged it back and Ramsey stroked the ball through Carricks legs into the far LH corner of the goal with Van der Sar helplessly at full stretch…..1-0……..

United continued to push on, but our young pole in goal was having a great afternoon, his presence and confidence clear to see as he dominated his area…….

Then the game really threatened to boil over as Song got the ball off Evra, but he got the player as well, Foy gave a free kick and a yellow, a melee of players threw a few handbags as Nani spat his dummy out wanting the ball back……Took 4 of them to get it off our Cameroonian Warrior……

The next United chance fell to the plastic Ronaldo “Nani” who went for the near post, Sczezesny stood firm and big, blocking the ball away from danger…

The stand out observations in the 2nd half were the tenacity of Arshavin as he flew into tackles…….And Ramsey was orchestrating the play with able support from Wilshere…….

At one break in play Wilshere and Ramsey grabbed a drink from the bench, as they stood on the touchline the boss, gave directions. As I looked down, I remarked to my friend,  that there was the future of Arsenal, keep those 2 and we will win trophies that I am so sure of…..Its an image I want to be seeing in the coming years…..

As Ramsey started another move, he went for his return ball, but Walcott put the ball in, to RVP at the far post, who only managed to hit the side netting….The 2nd would not come, chances were not been taken…….Djourou was replaced by Squillaci due to injury…….which added to the nerves in many……

Another break saw Wilshere stride forward centrally, Arshavin just ahead was screaming for a pass ahead of him. But Wilshere left it too late and didn’t make the chance count, as United cleared the ball away…..

Owen had come on and his only contribution was to dive to try and win a penalty, Clichy tried his hardest to make it look a penalty, as his foot raked his calf, if that had been given, he would have been slaughtered and the Press would have had an absolute field day…

Personally for me it was a dive, but it could have been given and I would have appealed at the other end, similar to Lucas for Liverpool, Owen played for the penalty… For some strange reason Foy forgot he is Fergies rent boy and waved play on…

Arsenal had a few breaks but didn’t capitalise, nerves jangled, United had the last chance as Foy gave a free kick against Ramsey who quite rightly said he got the ball, Nani having just watched a video of Arsenal free kicks on the journey down, blasted into the wall…….

A momentary pause as the fans await the whistle, its blown, 1-0 to the Arsenal…….the crowd largely still there, minimal early leavers, cheered as United fans left with their tails between their legs…

Ratings: (My untrained view)

Szczesny:…7.5…Solid confident display and made some vital saves, his kicking was putting us back under pressure in the 2nd half final minutes…Needs to see this and deal appropriately.

Sagna: …8…Strong defensively and handled all United threw at us. Some good attacking moments and had a long distance shot…For me best RB about at the moment, stopped us conceding in the first half…..

Djourou:…7….Better than last week, strong in the air, clears well, but as the pressure increased in the 2nd, he showed signs of pressure, still has a career ahead of him here, just needs to add a nasty streak for me…..

Koscienly:…7.5…Think it was a good performance, broke play up and pushed forward to give impetus to our play…..He really reads the game so well and cuts out so much, certainly could play the DM role when needed next season.

Clichy:…6…Some good attacking play, but woeful defending, with many silly balls lost, poor headers straight to United players and his usual moments of panic when he got the ball to feet…..His mind always seems to be elsewhere…..

Song…9…Immense, played Rooney off the park totally, in my mind wasn’t necessarily man marking the green eyed monster, but he was everywhere, certainly more defensive minded all round and played a key role, for me really pushed for man of the match, which I know many will go for.

Wilshere:…8…Outstanding play and very influential, much better in the 1st half, offered many outlets and complimented Ramsey……Goals will come next season…

Ramsey:…9…Absolute star, kept probing, never hid, when he did make a mistake  he helped win the ball back…Started and finished the move that ended with him beautifully caressing the ball into the net….That was his first start at home since that break…For me he gets the MotM, just ahead of Song for the goal,. But also his constant harassment of United and forcing mistakes, then initiating forays into their territory…..

Walcott:…8…Had an excellent game, some great crosses into the box, notably the one Vidic handled…Personally would have left him on, just feel he makes the other team nervous….

Nasri:…7…Excellent first half against a dogged opponent in Fabio. Went off injured.

Van Persie:…8… Great game, interlinked play and unlucky not to score. Held his nerve well and great assist for Ramsey. Led the team well, closed down well and worked the line well……Still prefer it when he drops deeper to control play…..

Subs:

Arshavin:…8… Excellent half and really defended like his life was on the line, was throwing tackles into United players with the more venom than Fergie chews his gum…..

Eboue:…6…Not enough time to judge….

Squillaci:…6…Not enough time to judge….

Manager:

Wenger:…8…Got his team up for it and showed that without Fabregas we do have a team that can win…Only made 1 tactical substitution, with Eboue for Walcott…Others forced on by injuries. Made a great decision to start Ramsey, people say how much we have missed Vermaelen this season, but so too young Aaron at times would have given us much more in attacking play….

Overall:

There’s an argument that with the pressure off we played better, I am in the middle, for me there was still the pressure of City breathing down our necks and also keeping in behind Chelsea.  I would agree that the pressure was different to previous weeks.

The team did us proud, they worked hard as a unit and press United, some said United were poor, for me it was due to our work ethic, so praise where praise is due, the score line flattered them really, although as some alluded to yesterday, it was a bittersweet victory which made the recent dropped points even more annoying…….

It has also handed the Chavs down the road a chance, but who do we really want to win out of the twins of ‘equal dislike’ ?

To be honest I don’t really care, just lets win our final 3 games, and see where we sit at the end, 66-1 for the title, which really needs a dramatic collapse from both teams, very unlikely, but then did Kate Middleton really believe as a kid she’d marry a Prince…………?

139 Comments | Uncategorized | Tagged: , , , , , , , | Permalink
Posted by peachesgÖÖner

« Previous Entries
Next Entries »