Arsenal’s Transfer Tragedy – Alan Davies Is Right

Alan Davies is many things: the fall guy for Stephen Fry (and latterly Sandi Toksvig) on the brainy panel show QI; a magician’s assistant who solves murders in Jonathan Creek; presenter of some show about dogs on Channel 5; the tonsorial inspiration for a bevy of mop-topped footballers from David Luiz, to Willian via Matteo Guendouzi; and a reasonably amusing comedian.

He is also a die-hard Arsenal fan and long-time season ticket holder who has done the hard yards over the years watching us lose away in every northern sh*thole town from Oldham to Barnsley.

He’s also quite good at ranting.

His memorable rants include his furious reaction to Aaron Ramsey having his leg snapped by the Shawcross animal, whom he memorably described as “a clumsy idiotic thug,” representing a club (Stoke City) that “are sent out to play like that.” 

Another rant about Liverpool’s refusal to play games on the same date as the Hillsborough tragedy led to him being told he should never go to Scouseland again (so, a clever move on Alan’s part there I think we can all agree – a bit like telling a fat bloke he’s banned from the salad bar).

Well, he’s been at it again following our recent rubbish performance against Aston Villa.

This was a good rant. A very good one. So good that I transcribed it after hearing it on his rather good podcast The Tuesday Club yesterday.

What I liked was that it was not a rant against Mikel Arteta, or about the fact that our team rolled over for Villa like a poncey lapdog that wants its tummy tickled. It wasn’t even a rant about Willian, my own bugbear from the performance.

Alan went deeper than that and identified the root of our current problems. Hearing it made me appreciate better the sheer scale of the challenge that El Patron has taken on here at Arsenal. It’s like he’s bought a house hoping to build a conservatory at the back and put a firepit in the garden, but he’s just discovered that the whole structure is infested with dry rot.

Here’s what Alan had to say:

Talk me through the Unai Emery period signings (I don’t know who’s responsible, if it’s Mislintat or Raul Sanllehi or Unai Emery). Leaving aside Kieran Tierney, if you look at Sokratis – £18 million, not noticeably an upgrade on Calum Chambers or Rob Holding or Shkodran Mustafi, already at the club: waste of £18 million.

You look at Jay Leno, £19 million, decent enough ‘keeper but not noticeably an upgrade on Emi Martinez who’s already at the club. 

Lucas Torreira, £22 million, half decent player but evidently much too small to play in the Premier League, nowhere near the power to survive in there.

Guendouzi seems to have bags of potential but is obviously raving mad and we knew he’d been raving mad because he’d fallen out with his manager in France and not noticeably better than Ainsley Maitland-Niles or Joe Willock who already we’ve got in the club, or Emile Smith-Rowe in fact, so no point buying him either.

And Nicholas Pepe: this kid is a bit of a streaky winger, not fully in control of his legs, a little bit Bambi, will he control it or will he not? He doesn’t know, no-one on the team knows. Brilliant at cutting inside and smashing it in a cross-cum-shot fashion out of play. Really, should we not have just kept Walcott? What is the point of spending £72 million?

Emery wanted Zaha, and for the money we spent on all that load of crap we could have got Zaha and Grealish. Honestly, the recruitment in that two-year period…

So Arteta is picking over the rubble of the end of Arsene Wenger, where there are players on monumental contracts… then the kind of chaos of who’s in charge in transfer policy and… that chubby bloke from Spain who looks like he’s just put out a fag who’s supposed to have a contact book that’s going to outdo everyone in the transfer market. 

Then we really bought into a load of flannel about how brilliant we were – do you remember we were told what a genius he is to get Pepe and then pay for him over five years? This is not the first time someone has had to pay in instalments – we still have to pay it! And at the moment he’s worth £22 million not £72 million, if that. 

“All of these transfers, I wish they had never happened I wish they had not allowed him to buy anyone. After that final in Baku I said sell the lot… just put all these kids in and find a left back, which we did in Tierney, and then we had  a half decent team: we had Martinez, Chambers, Holding, Bellerin, Tierney, we had lots of good talent in midfield, people who aren’t getting much of a look in like Rees Nelson, Eddie Nketiah, Joe Willock, Ainsley Maitland-Niles, Smith-Rowe, the absolute genius that is Bukayo Saka, the sheer brilliance of Martinelli: I thought this lot could really do something. 

I mean if we’re really going to be crap and finish 12th at least let this lot bond – and as it is we went and spent £170 million or some astronomical amount of money on crap.

Alan and his fellow podcasters went on to agree that there were signs of encouragement with our most recent pieces of transfer business, in that both Gabriel and Partey look like clear upgrades on what we already had.

But going back to the heart of his rant, can anyone really disagree with any of it?

Something very strange went on with transfer policy at Arsenal over a period of several years. The best we can say is that it was incompetence. The worst… well, the laws of libel constrain me from saying what I really think.

So, if our “ups” under Mikel Arteta are accompanied by some very deep “downs” from time to time, let’s cut the man some slack and take into account the context of the sh*t show he inherited.

RockyLives

6 Responses to Arsenal’s Transfer Tragedy – Alan Davies Is Right

  1. RockyLives says:

    LBG says:
    November 11, 2020 at 7:15 am (Edit)
    Much talk of Saliba’s vision last. Going to resurrect the idea of you giving him a chance alongside Gabriel, Mikel.
    The Saliba, Gabriel, Partey Triangle…….somewhere for Gooners to get lost in!

  2. RockyLives says:

    GoonerB says:
    November 11, 2020 at 8:17 am (Edit)
    I really thought Saliba was going to be a factor for us this year LBG. I have always had a feeling that they made the wrong call with how they oversaw his development this season, and more, I wonder if they realise this belatedly.

    His talent is obvious to see and from what I have seen he is one of those rare CD’s that ticks every box if you break down the skill sets; physical strength, pace, aerial ability, ability on the ball, reading of the game.

    Most CD’s, even at the top level, excel in certain areas but are lacking in one or two of them which is why Saliba could become that rare top of the top tier CD’s in the mould of a Vincent Kompany.

    What is against him is his tender age and experience, and seemingly a concern that he didn’t get a proper season last year due to injury. Still, at 19 he is around the age when everyone started to notice john Terry and he was becoming a regular 1st teamer, and with all the early EL games plus cup games he would surely have been better served by being involved in more 1st team games with us to date.

    Mikel like other managers is not happy with the fixture pile up, but that could have worked in Salibas favour had we utilised him more, but for some reason we haven’t.

  3. RockyLives says:

    jgsol
    3 hours ago

    Please help me to understand what you say.

    What are the ‘ups’ from the Arteta managership?

    Have we won more games than under Emery?

    Have we scored more goals than under Emery?

    Have we had more shots on target than under Emery?

    Are making more chances than under Emery?

    Are we a more entertaining team than under Emery?

    Are we a more attacking team than under Emery?

    Apart from letting in fewer goals than under Emery, is there anything that we are doing better now than then?

    That is one ‘up’. Where are the others than can be called ‘ups’ , in the plural

  4. LBG says:

    Hindsight is always the “genieus” that flies out of the lamp when the sun stops shining.
    Much to agree, now, with Mr Davies, however.
    Whoever made decisions about ‘worthy’ defenders from almost mid- Wenger onwards ( discounting Kos and the BFG, IMO), plainly only did their scouting on the fifth team pitches at Hackney Marshes!
    One would have thought we might have learnt from the Luznhy, Stepanov, Djourou, Senderos, Gallas, Silvestre, and Squillaci’s of the world, but no, even in relatively recent times we have Sokratis, Mustafi and Kolasinac
    But let’s deal with the defence, and give Jigsol an “up” from my point of view anyway. I believe we have now recruited the basis of a sound defence which, with good coaching, and a chance to play regularly together could give us good foundations on which to build. The soundness of the potential gave us wins (several) against Liverpool, Man City, and Chelsea and a FA Cup trophy and Charity Shield.
    In Partey I believe also, IF Torreira was a mistake, we have laid another solid stone around which a creative wall of Saka, Smith-Rowe, Willock, Elneny, AM-N and Nelson can be built.
    Was Aubang not joint top scorer in the Premier League last year. Is Laca not short on confidence and luck now. Do we give no credence, or make allowances for surely one of the hardest possible fixture starts to a season any team has had. Do we not believe that Eddie and especially Martinelli are potentially the real deal.
    I believe we are both a better and more entertaining team than under Emery ( largely because most now know what their jobs are!), and believe time is what is required and deserved for Mikel……and even Pepe.

  5. GoonerB says:

    Thanks Rocky, sorry but I sent a comment yesterday which seems to have got lost. Anyway suffice to say that of course Mikel requires more time. My one criticism is that he needs to change the formation now to improve our threat and potency going forwards.

    I think he should have started this by now but I am not worried by a mistiming of this in the bigger scheme of things as long as he makes the changes after this international break. I will become worried if that doesn’t happen however.

    At the moment we only have 2 key goal threats in Lacazette up top and Aubamayeng to his left, but even with them who is feeding them and picking out their runs?

    We have no attacking central midfielder to create and provide a goal threat. Willian is a limited goal threat on the right so we are a goal threat primarily from only 2 points of attack with limited quality supply to even those 2.

    We can increase that 2 point threat to 4 instantly if we play with inverted wing forwards either side of the 9 and play an attacking central midfielder. That is why it is important to go to a back 4 and drop 1 CB to allow for that extra attacking midfielder.

    Saka in that role with Pepe to the right and auba to the left of the 9 moves us from a 2 point attack to a 4 point attack and with the added bonus of the central attacking midfielder supplying that front 3 more.

  6. RockyLives says:

    New Post

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: